RF/EMF Microwave Radiation Sickness in America

Link to the original 2017 article, which has been edited, expanded and reformatted, below.

The Collateral Damage of the Wireless Revolution Will Be Us

In an interview before his execution, convicted U.S. bomber Timothy McVeigh referred to the deaths of 19 children killed in the government office building during the Oklahoma City bombings as "collateral damage": unintentional damage created while achieving his main goal. Since the Cold War, the U.S. government has known that Microwave Radio-Frequency Radiation (RFR) is biologically hazardous. The collateral damage of today's Wireless revolution over the last ten years will be microwave radiation sickness: intense suffering for some, universal harm and premature death for many.


For 25 years, starting in 1953, the Russians used Microwave RF Radiation to covertly attack the U.S. embassy staff in Moscow, Russia. The ongoing irradiation campaign affected about 1,800 employees and 3,000 dependents housed at the embassy during this period. The Russians targeted the U.S. embassy with RFR weapons from 2400 to 4100 MegaHertz (MHz), frequencies with wavelengths around 3 to 5 inches that are very similar to the wavelengths and power levels saturating us today where we live, work, go to school, commute and play. The very same adverse health outcomes inflicted on these embassy personnel (cancer, miscarriages, cataracts, immune system damages and more) are being caused today by the use of and exposure to ubiquitous Wireless mobile devices and infrastructure.

We are becoming victims of overusing the following, largely unnecessary, devices and infrastructure:

  • Cell phones
  • Cordless phones (land line or Voice-over-IP service)
  • Wireless laptops, tablets or Chromebooks
  • Wireless Access Points or Wireless Routers
  • Wireless Security Systems
  • Wireless Baby Monitors
  • Mobile communications base stations in all flavors
  • Antenna Arrays installed on Cell Towers, Roofs and Buildings
  • Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS), which are being installed on light poles everywhere

Wireless Radiation Exposures Are Similar to Cigarette Smoking

Chronic use of Wireless devices/infrastructure causes adverse long-term health outcomes, similar to those of chronic cigarette smokers. Our schools, offices, restaurants, planes and trains are filled with today's version of "second-hand smoke": the incessant Microwave Radio-Frequency Radiation exposures from which we cannot escape.

Do you remember when smoking was considered cool? Do you remember ubiquitous smoking allowed on planes and in restaurants? Do you remember how unpleasant and dangerous that was for everyone, including our children? Do you remember how ineffective smoking sections and non-smoking sections were? Smoke wafted everywhere.

America eventually got smart and banned second-hand cigarette smoke from our schools, offices, restaurants, planes and trains. Why are we now filling these places with a new "RFR second-hand smoke", Wi-Fi and mobile data frequencies and wavelengths? Ignorance. We were duped.

Wireless military technology (developed to win World Wars I and II) was unleashed on the unsuspecting public with full knowledge of the adverse health effects and without reasonable protections for American children and adults of all shapes, sizes and health profiles. It is plain and simple — despite the shouts of advertisers proclaiming Wireless products as cool (just as they did for cigarettes!), ubiquitous Wireless exposures are a disaster and have no place in our schools and public places.

Halt The Wireless Onslaught Because It Is Making Us Sick

We can end the race for ever-higher 4G/5G Wireless data rates and, instead, focus on expanding hardwired fiber optic and Ethernet technologies. We also can JUST SAY NO to the wrong-headed Internet of Things scam — a safety and security disaster. Our bodies simply cannot withstand these Wireless attacks.

There are over 25,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies since 1927 that establish the hazards of Wireless exposures, including the 2016 National Toxicology Program (NTP)'s 15-year, $25 million study on the Carcinogenesis from RFR exposure and the 2011 assessment by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), classifying RFR from any source as a Group 2B carcinogen, soon to be classified as a Group 1 Carcinogen.

IARC Group 1: The agent is carcinogenic to humans: "This category is used when there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans. Exceptionally, an agent may be placed in this category when evidence of carcinogenicity in humans is less than sufficient but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals and strong evidence in exposed humans that the agent acts through a relevant mechanism of carcinogenicity."

The NTP, part of the US Federal Government's National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), reported its final results from 900 MHz RFR exposures in May, 2016. The study proved that a dose/response relationship exists between RFR exposure and serious adverse health effects: brain tumors, heart tumors, hyperplasias (abnormal cell growths that are precursors to tumors) and other heart damage. The results also proved that total RFR exposure over time (dose) is the key metric needed to assess RFR levels. Unfortunately, US Federal RFR guidelines are only commercial guidelines, not safety guidelines and only consider rates of exposure, not dose or total exposure over time, which is what truly matters to one's safety.

Ronald Melnik, PhD, former Senior Toxicologist and Director of Special Programs in the Environmental Toxicology Program at the NIEHS and designer of the NTP study states,

“The NTP tested the hypothesis that cell phone radiation could not cause health effects and that hypothesis has now been disproved. The experiment has been done and, after extensive reviews, the consensus is that there was a carcinogenic effect . . . these [NTP] results clearly show that that [radio-frequency] radiation can cause adverse health effects . . . risk is determined from the dosimetry, which is the absorbed power [multiplied by] time [of exposure] [and] the tumor response".

Take Action To Protect Yourselves and Your Loved Ones



We need to power off Wireless Access Points in our children's classrooms, set strict limits on our children's use of cell phones, and permanently halt the installation of Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) on the light poles just a few feet in front of our homes, workplaces and schools. The industrial-strength antennas in these products are simply too close to ourselves and our loved ones.

We are at a critical inflection point in history: our governments and industries are in business together, willingly sacrificing our rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness in order to execute a Wireless agenda of control. First forced installation of so-called Smart Meters (while ignoring the very International Building Codes designed to protect us), then forced Wireless exposures in classrooms for every minute of every school day and now an alleged "National Priority" called 5G — fifth generation data services: the largest Spectrum power-grab in history.







The panoply of currently-used and planned frequencies, wavelengths and modulations that are slated to fill our public and private spaces both indoors and outdoors is staggering.

  • 5G: 600 MHz = waves 20 inches long
  • 4G: 700 MHz = waves 17 inches long
  • 3G/4G: 800 MHz = waves 15 inches long
  • 3G/4G: 900 MHz = waves 13 inches long
  • 3G/4G: 1800 MHz = waves 7 inches long
  • 3/4G: 2100 MHz = waves 6 inches long
  • Wi-Fi: 2450 MHz = waves 5 inches long (unlicensed)
  • 5G: 3100 MHz to 3550 MHz = waves 3.8 to 3.3 inches long
  • 5G: 3550 MHz to 3700 MHz = waves 3.3 to 3.2 inches long
  • 5G: 3700 MHz to 4200 MHz = waves 3.2 to 2.8 inches long
  • 5G: 4200 to 4900 MHz = waves 2.8 to 2.4 inches long
  • Wi-Fi: 5800 MHz = waves 2.0 inches long (unlicensed)
  • 5G: 24,250 to 24,450 MHz = waves 0.5 inch long
  • 5G: 25,050 to 25,250 MHz = waves 0.5 inch long
  • 5G: 25,250 to 27,500 MHz = waves 0.4 inch long
  • 5G: 27,500 to 29,500 MHz = waves 0.4 inch long
  • 5G: 31,800 to 33,400 MHz = waves 0.4 inch long
  • 5G: 37,000 to 40,000 MHz = waves 0.3 inch long
  • 5G: 42,000 to 42,500 MHz = waves 0.3 inch long
  • 5G: 57,000 to 64,500 MHz = waves 0.3 inch long (unlicensed)
  • 5G: 64,000 to 71,000 MHz = waves 0.2 inch long
  • 5G: 71,000 to 76,000 MHz = waves 0.2 inch long
  • 5G: 81,000 to 86,000 MHz = waves 0.1 inch long

Notice how much of the RF Spectrum will be devoted to the proposed extremely-high-data-rate 5G services that promise to enable downloads of two-hour movies in Ultra-High Definition 4K video in a few seconds. Transmissions of such gargantuan data payloads does not happen by butterflies and magic; these data transmissions require unprecedented amounts of electricity to be sprayed into the very air in which all living organisms (plants, insects, pollinators, animals and humans) attempt to thrive. Can living organisms thrive in these man-made, highly-charged environments? The science through 2016 is telling us NO.

Many have heard of RFR frequencies and wavelengths, but fewer understand modulation: the complicated process that modulates (encodes) data on these frequencies/wavelengths, so the data can be sent to a mobile device that demodulates (decodes) the data at the other end. A modem is a device that literally modulates and demodulates data; engineers shortened the name to modem.

The Data Game: Modulation/Demodulation

Today's popular carrier-wave frequencies (600 MHz to 5800 Mhz) and wavelengths (2 to 20 inches) are made even more dangerous when Wireless companies encode digital data (text, voice, images and video) on these waves using high-density modulation/demodulation schemes such as Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM/OFDMA). These modulation schemes are essentially complicated mathematical transformations designed to densely pack even more data symbols on the carrier waves to promise ever-larger data payloads, transmitted at ever-increasing speeds. Sending these modulated electrical pulses over fiber optic or Ethernet cables is efficient and safe. The problem starts when we choose to indiscriminately spray these electrical pulses through the air, wirelessly.

Using OFDM and the multiple access OFDMA, Wireless Companies pulse many millions of powerful bursts of electricity through the air each second, with each pulse lasting just millionths of a second, and each pulse transmitting every 66.7 millionths of a second, as explained in this video series.


Many quadrillions of pulses of electricity are sprayed through the air at 671 Million miles per hour, damaging all living things in its path: plants, insects, pollinators, animals and humans. This is the deadly, secret sauce that enables Wi-Fi, 4G and future 5G transmissions to transmit video data wirelessly — a mind-bendingly trivial pursuit.

Think about it. We are literally sacrificing our long-term health in order to Wirelessly watch videos on our mobile devices: cat videos, sports highlights or sitcoms. How utterly trivial and foolish. If you watched these videos through a hardwired coaxial or Ethernet cable, there would be no adverse health effects.

These are the foolish choices being made in Washington, DC, on Madison Avenue and ultimately in your own homes. It is your personal decision to stream video wirelessly which is creating the demand that the Wireless companies are glad to fill for a fee. When you choose to stream video wirelessly, you are mindlessly financing your own demise and the demise of future generations because dense data-carrying Wireless microwaves create oodles of genetic damages and fertility problems.

Back to the 1950's to 1970's at the US Embassy in Moscow

In the mid 1970's, a medical team from Johns Hopkins University, working under direction of Dr. Abraham Lilienfield was commissioned by the U.S. State Department to study the health effects of the Moscow irradiation on our embassy staffers. The draft report documented numerous symptoms of radiation poisoning, including immune system disorders, high white blood cell counts, chronic fatigue, blurred vision, cataracts and muscle aches.

Information on cancer was deliberately withheld from the Lilienfield team, but it was later reported that cancer incidence among embassy staff was four times greater than normal and the embassy staff had reproductive problems, abnormal red and white blood cells, above average chromosomal aberrations, higher than normal rates of miscarriage, and pregnancy complications. Embassy staff with blood abnormalities were advised not to conceive children until six months after their somatic levels had returned to normal in a non-irradiated environment.

It should also be noted that U.S. State Department chief medical officer Herbert Pollack sanitized the conclusions of the Lilienfield report. The final report falsely concluded that no important health effects were associated with the embassy's Microwave Radio-Frequency Radiation exposures.

The original data, however, are publicly available and have been analyzed by independent scientists, including by Dr. Neil Cherry and Dr. Paul Dart. Both men concluded that Microwave Radio-Frequency Radiation exposures at levels far below current US RFR guidelines have resulted in significant adverse health effects for the US Embassy personnel.

Dr. Neil Cherry reported in 2000:

"The Soviets irradiated the U.S. Embassy in Moscow between 1953 and 1978 . . . the dominant [resulting] cancers [for Embassy personnel] were brain tumor and leukemia and reproductive organ cancer. This study confirms that extremely low level chronic microwave exposure is associated which very significant increases in illness and mortality in organs across the whole body, consistent with widespread cellular chromosome damage. Significantly elevated chromosome aberrations were measured, as well as significant alterations in white and red blood cell counts, Jacobson (1969), which would also be the expected result from reduced melatonin . . .

It is stated by both Hill (1965) and Goldsmith (1992) that elevated Odds and Risk Ratios are also relevant to the public health protection basis in epidemiology. Professor Goldsmith was closely associated with the staff affected by the chronic [RFR] exposure of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow and obtained information through the Official Information Act. This included the blood test results and minutes of meetings which record the fact that the State Department case officer, Dr. Herbert Pollack, changed the conclusions of the final report compared with the draft report, to state that no effects could be associated with the [RFR] exposure, Goldsmith (1997). The data and Dr. Goldsmith show that this is not true . . .

A highly remarkable result is the dose-response relationship for a range of sicknesses. Despite the small numbers, the lack of long latency period and dilutionary factors, the Lilienfeld data shows a significant increases in:

  • Cardiac problems
  • Neurological and psychological symptoms
  • Altered blood cell counts
  • Increased chromosome aberrations, and
  • Elevated cancer in children and adults
  • Sickness increasing in a dose-response manner with years of residence.

As with Robinette et al. (1980), the data presented in the Lilienfeld contract report is contrary to that stated in the report’s (altered) conclusions. These symptoms are associated with chronic exposure to very low intensity pulsed microwaves . . .

The fact that the State Department case officer, Dr Herbert Pollack, altered the conclusions, attests to the significance of this study, the results of which would be embarrassing to the U.S. Government, both in terms of compensation and in terms of the validity of the U.S. exposure standard."

Dr. Paul Dart reported in 2014 in his Video, "US Embassy in Moscow 1953-1978"
https://youtu.be/owCeCC6B69k?t=4m07s — from 4:07 to 6:33

"Beams of microwaves from Soviet sources aimed at the US embassy building in Moscow were detected from 1953 through 1978. In 1976, an epidemiological study was commissioned by the U.S. Department of State to investigate the health effects on the staff of the US embassy in Moscow and their families.

From 1953 to May 1975, the microwave beam came from a source in a Soviet apartment building about 100 meters west of the 10 floor embassy building, affecting the west facade of the central building, with highest intensities between the third and eighth floors. From May 1975 through 1978, there were beams from two sources, originating from buildings about 100 meters east, and south, of the embassy. The frequencies were from 2400 MHz to 4100 MHz and exposures were at power densitites of between 20,000 µW/m² and 280,000 µW/m².

Exposed embassy staff experienced a statistically significant excess of several problems, including: depression, irritability, difficulty in concentrating, memory loss, ear problems, skin problems, vascular problems, and other health problems, including cancers and miscarriages. Incidence increased significantly with accrued years of exposure."

In 2017, Your Child's Classrooms Are Under Similar Wireless Attack

     Photo: © 2016, Eric Windheim, Windeheim EMF Solutions | 916-395-7336



Peak RF Microwave Radiation from one Wireless Access Point and 20 Wirelessly connected laptops in an Elk Grove, CA Classroom measured 165,000 µW/m² in July, 2016, and would have been 250,000 µW/m² to 330,000 µW/m², if the full range of RFR frequencies (2400-5800 MHz) had been metered. In addition, Peak RFR microwave radiation from one Wireless Access Point's beacon signals in a Petaluma, CA classroom was measured at 175,000 µW/m² in August, 2013; if 20 wireless devices had been connected to this classroom WAP Wirelessly, then the peak RFR readings would have been at least double that reading.

Compare current US classroom Peak RFR levels of 175,000 to 330,000 µW/m² to the 20,000 to 280,000 µW/m² beamed at the US Embassy personnel in Moscow. This doesn't look good, at all. The following additional data points will enable us to connect the dots and convince us take action to eliminate Microwave Radio-Frequency Radiation sources and infrastructure from our schools, neighborhoods and public spaces.


Camilla Rees, MBA, Educator, discussing her project to measure ambient microwave radiation for clients in New York City, 2016:

"I went to measure the apartment on the first floor there and the man had throat cancer and as I got towards the corner bedroom, the levels [of audible radiation] kept getting higher and higher....We found out it was coming from outside and it was one block diagonally across the street with an antenna farm on a five-story group of buildings that was beaming directly into this area. And it dawned on all of us what this man was dealing with. And they told me that [of] eight out of the nine apartments, in the corner bedrooms they had cancer and the ninth one had three miscarriages." [1]

Bio-Initiative Report 2012 (updated 2014):

"Bioeffects are clearly established and occur at very low levels of exposure to electromagnetic fields and radio-frequency radiation. Bioeffects can occur in the first few minutes at levels associated with cell and cordless phone use. Bioeffects can also occur from just minutes of exposure to mobile phone masts [cell towers], Wi-Fi and wireless utility "smart" meters that produce whole body exposure. Chronic base station [cell tower] exposures can result in illness." [2]

EUROPAEM 2015 Guideline for Prevention and Treatment of Wireless Radiation Illnesses:

"Analysis of the data available on the exposure of people living near mobile phone base stations has yielded clear indications of adverse health effects like fatigue, depression, difficulty in concentrating, headaches, dizziness, etc." [3]

Microwave Radiation Sickness from Antennas Is Everywhere Now



Mobile communications and mobile entertainment require a human environment overflowing with disease-inducing pulsed, data-carrying microwave radiation, both indoors and outdoors. The photo is of the Stockholm Central Railway Station in Sweden. A 2016 study of the man-made Microwave Radio-Frequency Radiation (RFR) pollution within this facility was conducted by the Hardell Cancer Research Group in Sweden.[4] This study is a reality check on the large number of RFR wavelengths/modulations which simultaneously bombard our bodies everywhere we go. RFR is a sneaky toxic agent because most can't see it, smell it, taste it or hear it. But and more of us can now feel it: and report migraine headaches, skin rashes and nausea.



Twenty different pulsed wavelengths/modulations were found within this cavernous facility. Investigators used a professional RFR dosimeter to identify a variety of wavelengths/modulations, tuned for European frequencies, including

  • FM radio and police/fire radio from 80-500 MegaHertz (MHz)
  • GSM signals from 800 MHz to 1800 MHz
  • UMTS/3G frequencies span 1900 MHz to 2200 MHz
  • 4G/LTE signals from 700 MHz to 2600 MHz
  • Wi-Fi signals range from 2450 MHz to 5800 MHz
  • WiMAX from 3300-3900 MHz

Wavelengths are critically important information to determine how you can most effectively manage your Wireless devices in your homes, offices, schools and public spaces (indoor and outdoor). Hint: keep any Wireless device out of your pockets, use it only sparingly and maintain a 36-48" distance from any device with antennas that are powered on and uploading/downloading data (which antennas do nearly all the time).

This electro-pollution is measured as high-frequency electromagnetic voltage, which literally charges the air with intense peaks of electricity. This pollution oscillates the polarity of human cells (negative-positive) millions to billions of times per second, a situation that does not occur in nature. This pollution is the voltage of many illnesses, including cancer.

The wave carcinogen in Stockholm Central Station is delivered through numerous frequency channels for radiation from both uplink (from mobile devices) and downlink (from fixed antennas). Each of these biologically-active frequencies slams living flesh with its own peculiar modulation pulses. A human body in this environment becomes a breathing antenna for a multitude of strange electromagnetic vibrations that are alien to all natural biological rhythms. These electromagnetic manipulations are widely-documented to rearrange human genetic material. As with the United States and Western Europe, Swedish cancer rates continue to rise exponentially. Young Swedish women, especially, are now suffering a striking increase in the variety of thyroid cancer linked to radiation exposure. [5]

Many published studies confirm the carcinogenicity of Wireless radiation but each study focuses on the biological exposure of only a single frequency! No published scientific study yet has explored the aggregate biological effects of the complex, multi-frequency radiation which now pollutes inhabited buildings and the general environment everywhere across the globe.

The oncologists who completed the Stockholm study represent four Swedish medical institutions. These researchers include in their report the latest scientific evidence of sickness and cancers associated with the wireless radiation measured at Stockholm Central. They confirm that many negative biological consequences, for both people and animals, are induced by far lower power density levels than those found within the rail station. They stress the urgency of officially designating the invasive wireless radiation in Stockholm Central as an IARC Group 1 CONFIRMED HUMAN CARCINOGEN, thereby recognizing this pollution on par with asbestos and nuclear radiation. And they warn that "it is imperative to measure the public's exposure" in order to accommodate future epidemiological studies of the damage from wireless that we all suffer today.

READ THE STOCKHOLM STUDY HERE

Moduation and the March of the G's: From 2G to 3G to 4G and now to 5G

The late Robert C. Kane, Ph.D., whose career included electrical engineering for Motorola, advised:

"The belief that microwaves cannot cause bond breaking in chromosomes or DNA, or damage tissue more generally is quite inaccurate. Since the energy absorption mechanism is not the same as that for ionizing radiation, such as X-rays, the mechanisms of energy transfer that cause the bond breaking may be different. However the result is quite evident — DNA and chromosomal damage . . . It's not just happening at one frequency and it’s not just being observed by researchers in one laboratory. The same chromosome and DNA damages are being reported at frequencies across the entire range, including 100 MHz [FM radio], 300-500 MHz [police/fire], 700-2100 MHz [cell phones], 2450 MHz [Wi-Fi, Bluetooth], and up to 9000 MHz [vehicle-to-vehicle radar systems]." [6] The wireless antenna signals bombarding Stockholm Central are the same as those which pollute public buildings, sports arenas, schools, medical centers, cities, towns and neighborhoods of the USA. A foremost European expert in radio engineering confirms the incredible complexity of this ubiquitous electrosmog:

"There are now about 20 modulation systems in widespread common use, plus about 50 or more specialist ones." Regarding the manipulation of radio signals to increase data speed and accommodate millions of eager Wireless users, he says: "Phase modulation is a relatively new technique ... that allows far more data to be encoded onto an RF carrier (microwave signal) ... Instead of a nice smooth sine wave, the RF carrier repeatedly jumps from one part of the sine wave to a different part, as it encodes the data. This produces a lot of VERY fast, sharp "edges" and a lot of "aggressive" low frequency noise (10-HZ to 100 kilohertz) or even faster." [7]

These two charts illustrate the typical wave forms of wireless signals which penetrate our brains and bodies. The wave form shown in the top chart is indicative of the older 2G technology of GSM/TDMA. The second chart below shows the wave form of the more complex 3G signal of UMTS propagated with CDMA modulation.

A 2016 paper signed by six radiation experts, states that the risk to humans for glioma brain cancer is OVER THREE TIMES HIGHER from exposure to the more complex 3G UMTS signals shown in the bottom chart, than from the less complex 2G signals shown in the top chart. They also state that the 3G signals may be more effective at preventing the repair of broken DNA. [8] This matters because broken and unrepaired DNA is the bedrock of human cancers.

Now take a look below at the ultra-complex wave form of the newer 4G/LTE radiation, propagated from in-hand smart devices and from the newest neighborhood antennas. It is obvious that 4G/LTE wave patterns, delivered in multiple data streams (MIMO) and using OFDM modulations, are immeasurably more data-dense and complex in pulse structure than 2G and 3G.

Scientists have had neither time nor money to investigate how the 4G/LTE signals may increase human cancer risks. We all need to connect the dots, here.

In 2015, three renowned scientists cooperated to publish a paper which explains why the violently erratic wave radiation seen in these charts is so catastrophic to biological creatures who generate their own internal electromagnetic wave forms. Annotated with 103 medical citations, this report notes that all living organisms perceive Wireless radiation as a potent environmental stressor, for which evolution has provided no adequate defense. The authors reference copious medical evidence showing that it is the perpetual change in frequencies/wavelengths and pulsed modulations which stress living cells the most. They say that modulated radiation used for wireless technologies is actually more biologically stressful than excessive heat, cold, starvation and toxic chemicals. Living cells produce heat-shock proteins within minutes of exposure to RFR/microwave assaults. Heat shock proteins cascade into free radical formation, followed by drastic DNA damage, which precedes the development of cancer. [9]

The latest science confirms that modulated, data-bearing RF/microwave signals deliver brutal micro-shocks to the DNA within living cells. The European REFLEX studies of 2004 clearly demonstrated that a mere 24-hour exposure to the 1800 MHz, one of the frequencies flowing through Stockholm Central, inflicts the same catastrophic damage to human DNA as 1600 chest X-rays. [10] Many other recent studies confirm that microwaves across the MegaHertz (MHz) and GigaHertz (GHz) spectrum effectively ravage the genetic material in human cells. Dr. Henry Lai, whose research at the University of Washington produced some of these studies, confirms:

“....Critical genetic mutations in one single cell are sufficient to lead to cancer.” [11]

The wireless frequencies found within Stockholm Central, as well as within most public and private buildings across the United States, have potential to inflict gross genetic mutations, which conflicts directly with America's goals to "cure" cancer and halt autism.

There is also the dirty electricity factor. Dr. Sam Milham is an expert on the devastating health effects (including diabetes and cancer) of stray impulse and oscillatory transients, which carry erratic spikes of voltage throughout electrical wires in our electrical grid and home wiring.

Dr. Milham explains:

"Don't forget that every cell tower has an inverter or switching power supply to change the grid AC to DC to run the microwave transmitter and to charge the backup batteries. These generate dirty electricity [kilohertz pollution] which flows back onto the grid." [12]

The RF/microwave pollution from cell tower antennas sited close to electrical generation stations and power lines can couple with and flow through the transmission lines, even in some cases creating dangerous standing RF waves along those transmission lines. UK radiation expert Alasdair Philips says:

"Radiation from masts [like the microwave tower seen behind this electrical substation] can resonate with house wiring, causing high fields inside houses, often from lights which hang from the ceilings, the radio frequencies running down the electric flex. If this is the case in a house, there may be high frequency fields inside, even though there are no direct sources of radio-frequency emissions from household appliances, devices or systems." [13]

Often the highest microwave readings in a Wireless-polluted house can be found at the electrical outlets. This is why broadband over power lines (BOP) is such a dangerous technology. This is also why mounting microwave antenna arrays in Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) mounted on light poles in front of our homes, schools and offices is a disaster.

The photographer who took this urban photo carried a variety of electromagnetic radiation meters. On the residential sidewalk where he stood, the wildly fluctuating microwave RFR readings exceeded the upper limit of his RFR instrument (6 volts per meter). The magnetic field readings also exceeded his instrument limit of 100 milligauss. Wherever there is electrical voltage there are also powerful and erratic magnetic fields.

These high readings within a residential area far exceed the power densities associated with severe fatigue and illness, including dementia and childhood leukemia. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) confirms that both the high and low frequencies raging through this site can cause cancer in humans. [14]


In 2016, scientists in Switzerland compiled complex studies of genes and molecular pathways to confirm once again that there are many plausible linkages between these powerful RF/EMF fields and severe human disease. [15] No one yet knows exactly how the hazardous conditions are amplified in a combination situation, like this, where people live and work for years in buildings invaded by a ferocious, multi-frequency electromagnetic storm.

In addition, airborne particle pollution from the heavy traffic flowing through this site, can form a deadly "corona" of split ions around high tension electric power lines. Electrically-charged pollutant aerosols become "sticky," and when inhaled, they have a much higher probability of embedding deeply within the lungs. [16] No studies have yet been published on the enhanced toxicity of particle pollution electromagnetically charged by the millions of RF/microwave antennas in our midst.

The Slow Kill: How Antenna Sickness Unfolds

Despite the prolific science of harm, the Wireless Industry has one major goal above all others: to increase and enhance the microwave irradiation of the human environment. Therefore, the US environment becomes more deadly by the day as Wireless profiteers continue to affix new small cell antennas on buildings, lamp posts, electric poles, street furniture, bus stops, forming Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS).

Mobile providers simply can't hang 'em fast enough in order to increase capacity and sell us more data bandwitdh. Verizon, the number one US wireless provider, is rapidly "densifying" outdoor urban areas with a new generation of 4G small cell "nodes" as it also prepares for its 5G experiments.

"Densification is important because people like to use their smart phones," explains Verizon. [17]

The fact that others would like to maintain their health in a much calmer Wireless environment is apparently immaterial in the Wireless Microwave RFR age.

Verizon is also unleashing Ericsson's indoor Radio Dot antenna systems for commercial USA, apparently with no liability whatever for the illness and disability which this powerful, in-your-face 4G/LTE radiation may inflict upon people trapped within antenna-festooned buildings. [18] Nearly every person in the USA is now irradiated with pulsed data-carrying Wireless frequencies/modulations 24/7/365. So we need to know what ultimately becomes of a population trapped, without their fully-informed consent, in a carcinogenic wasteland.

In 1996, Professor Dr. Karl Hecht and his associate Hans-Ullrich Balzer were commissioned by the German Federal Institute for Telecommunications to conduct research on a massive collection of Soviet Russian technical literature ((1960-1996) which documents the health-damaging effects of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation. In 1997, Hecht and Balzer turned over to their sponsor a massive report based on 878 scientific works. The data has reportedly "disappeared" into a German archive. [19]

According to Professor Hecht, this massive scientific collection confirms that the duration of microwave irradiation is a foremost decisive factor in human health effects: the longer the exposure, the more deadly the cumulative effects.

Therefore, the multi-millions of always-on cellular and Wi-Fi antennas littering the country are a very dangerous condition. Russian research showed that there are three phases in the slow, but steady downward spiral of human populations chronically irradiated by radio/microwave antennas, including radar. [20]

Every system in the body is eventually affected, including eyesight, hearing and cognitive function. Since each person's body is genetically different, and since each person's exposure is unique, each and every Wireless-radiation victim will traverse the following phases in his or her own time. Each will develop uniquely individual symptoms.

Phase One:

In the first 1-3 years of irradiation, one's body tries to compensate for and resist the Wireless assault.


In this first phase, a sympathicotonic effect is seen. The definition of sympathicotonia (hypertonia) is increased stress of the sympathetic nervous system and a marked tendencies for vascular spasms and abnormal blood pressure. Therefore, studies should be conducted across the US to determine to what extent cell tower radiation, which now screams through the interior of millions of inhabited buildings, is connected to the suffering of millions of Americans who struggle with dangerous high blood pressure, especially those cases for which no other cause can be found. Phase One proceeds in three sub-phases:

Sub-phase A:
This is the sympathicotonia (hypertonia) activation phase. It is comparable with the alarm phase of the general adaptation syndrome of Selye and with the unspecific activation according to [Lindsley, 1951] [Lacey, 1967] and others. This means that the body launches its resources into high alert status.

Sub-phase B:
This is the performance-promoting, increased sympathicotonic reaction phase. It often features negative emotional activation [Lindsley, 1951] [Selye, 1953] including feelings of stress and/or anxiety rooted in physiological responses to the radiation.

Sub-phase C:
Still part of the resistance phase, the body continues to attempt adaptive balancing, with less sympathicotonic deflection. During this phase, body functions are still mainly in the range of homeostasis, so normal values are usually measured, although latent, intermittently-appearing ailments may already express themselves. People in this phase, who can connect the dots between illness and irradiation and then take steps to mitigate exposure, are the lucky ones. They can often recover their health in a non-radiation environment. Most people, however, don't understand this connection because wireless pollution escapes their sensory detection. Thus, the majority of people slip into the advanced phases two and three, from which there may be little or no recovery.

Phase Two:

During 3-5 years of irradiation, one's body progresses to Pre-Morbid or Early Phases of Chronic Disease

During this second phase, chronically irradiated people develop weakly visible, pathological neurasthenic symptoms with vagotonic reaction tendencies. This means overactivity or irritability of the vagus nerve, adversely affecting function of the blood vessels, stomach, and muscles. It also means that the parasympathetic autonomic system is overactive, while sleep disorders and daytime tiredness are common. Neurasthenic symptoms involve: poor appetite or overeating, insomnia or hypersomnia, low energy and fatigue, low-self esteem, poor concentration, difficulty making decisions and feelings of hopelessness. In its most severe form, this phase may include a chronic disturbance of mood called dysthymia (depressive neurosis) in which a depressive mood accompanies the other physiological features listed here. This might explain why millions of Americans need anti-depressant drugs and illegal narcotics to cope with their radiation-induced depressive symptoms. By this end of this stage, the systemic damage may be irreversible, even if the radiation exposure ceases.

Phase Three:

After 5+ years of irradiation, one's body degenerates into exhaustion and severe morbidity

This final degenerative phase produces pronounced neurasthenic symptoms with increasing pathological lapses of the regulation system, sleep disorders, daytime tiredness, and general exhaustion. People who have progressed to this phase suffer a dramatic increase in chronic illnesses and elevated cancer incidence. After 15+ years of environmental Wireless radiation, America's chronically-ill population certainly fits this description. A 2016 study by researchers at Emory University confirms that over one half of the US adult population is now chronically ill: "The health of individuals is increasingly being defined by complexity and multi-morbidity, the co-occurrence of two or more chronic medical conditions." [21] However, not one in a million would guess that the mortal misery of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, Alzheimer's and even depressive mental illness, is inextricably connected to years of covert irradiation delivered by crafty Wireless profiteers who have been laughing all the way to the bank.

Yet, Americans Don't Seem to Really Care . . .

Despite their chronic exposure to ubiquitous environmental radiation, most Americans add exponentially to their personal dosage of wave carcinogen with daily hours of exposure to on-the-body wireless devices. The irony here is, that while the masses eternally clutch and fondle their cancer-inducing devices, manufacturers warn in the fine print of manuals to keep these devices some distance away from direct contact with the body.

With the joyful complicity of its radiation victims, the great and powerful Techno-Beast moves ever forward with a whirlwind of new death technologies, while skillfully keeping the masses "stoned" on what behavioral scientists are now calling "digital heroin." One in three American babies are hooked on Wireless radiation devices before they can talk. America's 8-to-10 years-olds spend hours per day on digital media while many teens spend 11 hours+ a day with a wireless toys. [24] Dr. Nicholas Kardaras, a leading neuropsychologist and addiction specialist, explains why: "We now know that those iPads, smart phones and Xboxes are a form of digital drug.

Recent brain imaging research is showing that they affect the brain's frontal cortex which controls executive functioning — including impulse control — in exactly the same way that cocaine does. Technology is so hyper-arousing that it raises dopamine levels — the feel-good neurotransmitter most involved in the addiction dynamic — as much as sex." [25]

How widespread is America's youthful Wireless-Addiction?


Dr. Kardaras reports that 64 million American kids between the ages of 2-17 play video games which are shown by scientists to "affect the development of microstructural properties of the brain associated with negative psychological outcomes."

Dr. Kardaras says: "Once a kid has crossed the line into true tech addiction, treatment can be very difficult. Indeed, I have found it easier to treat heroin and crystal meth addicts than lost-in-the-matrix video gamers or Facebook-dependent social media addicts."

Gaming companies will hire neurobiologists and neuroscientists to hook up electrodes to the test-gamer. If they don't elicit the blood pressure they shoot for, typically 180 over 120 or 140 within a few minutes of playing, and if they don't show sweating and and increases in their galvanic skin responses, they go back and tweak the game to get the maximum addicting and arousing responses that they're looking for.' "This is how the Wireless industry now "harvests" American youth, as if they were row crops.

Dr. Kardaras confirms that this deadly addiction has been micro-planned by corporate predators:

"The video game business is a sophisticated, multi-billion dollar industry devoted entirely to creating addictive products aimed at defenseless kids and young people--like shooting fish in a barrel."

The great worry is not only the deterioration of physical health, but also the mental health of these millions of young digital addicts. Dr. Kardaras says:

"Hundreds of clinical studies show that screens increase depression, anxiety and aggression and can even lead to psychotic-like features when the game player loses touch with reality."

In such a deep state of techno-bondage, America's small-screen stoners are obviously incapable of caring about their personal well-being, let alone about the disastrous impact upon all living creatures from the millions of antennas needed to service their Wireless addiction.

READ NEW YORK POST STORY HERE

4G/5G Wireless Is Coming Fast and Furious

At least we now understand why mobile providers can't run fast enough to erect more antennas across the landscape. Take for example Indiana's 2015 announcement that the state would erect an additional 300 cell towers on park lands, state officials perhaps realizing that no small screen addict could possibly visit a recreational park without a "fix." [26]

Meantime, industry publications such as The Wireless Estimator describe in detail the unfathomable and forever-profits flowing to wireless providers and infrastructure industries which carry death in their wings. The Estimator even provides detailed reports of workers, especially hapless "tower dogs," who die in accidents while constructing wireless towers across the nation. [27]

A real eyeopener would be an independent national study of cancer and leukemia incidence among Wireless workers who are routinely sent up towers to service active antennas without proper radiation protection.

As with tobacco, asbestos, diethylstilbestrol, vinyl chloride and thalidomide, all Wireless irradiated persons will inevitably suffer the effects of unbridled, unregulated and improperly tested microwave pollution. Through inevitable illness and mental impairment inherent in this radiation, Americans who survive our current era of Wireless mania will ultimately recount the bitter lessons learned from violating every natural law in order to obtain the pleasure, comfort, entertainment and convenience of wireless technologies. As with smokers across the decades, millions of Wireless victims will undoubtedly be catapulted into body landfills before society, as a whole, finally "gets it." Wireless-addicted Megahertz Mamas and Gigahertz Guys are calling down upon themselves an unlimited and brutal blizzard of antenna radiation. Driven to Wireless madness by an amoral and predatory industry, these herd humans are thundering towards more and more and more wireless consumption, increasing the need for ever more antennas in ever more places. The exponentially powerful 4G/LTE tower seen above was erected in late 2016. It's one of thousands of new 4G towers going up across the nation as fast as construction crews can be assembled.

The 4G towers, loaded with extra-wide MIMO antennas, excrete pulsed radiation in the 700-800 megahertz (million hertz) spectrum, or channels within the 2.6 gigahertz (billion hertz) spectrum. Notice that the new 4G/LTE antennas are planted exceptionally low to the ground, compared to older tower antennas. The lower the antennas, the higher the emissions at ground level. These emissions are well-documented to be as insidious and as ultimately deadly as nuclear radiation.

If you don't have an affordable audio microwave detector with which to hear the intense and noxious radiation raging to and from antennas like these, it's a darned shame! The metallic microwave "scream" is unwavering and intense for over a mile in all directions from this particular tower. The words to the music go like this: SWING LOW SWEET CHARIOT, COMIN' FOR TO TAKE US ALL "HOME." Property owners of the residence seen to the left of this 4G tower may receive a handsome lease payment for hosting the facility on their doorstep. But here is the type of public warning signs that are posted at the base of cell tower complexes:

The toxic 4G/LTE towers make possible the streaming of TV, movies and videos for America's youth, wrapped around their smart phones and tablets 24/7. A sizeable percentage of traffic coming through 4G antennas is video streaming for mobile devices, now that Americans have been conditioned to expect small screen entertainment everywhere they go. A kid streaming a video or movie into a phone or tablet that he holds in his hands, with Bluetooth buds in his ears, is downloading an extremely complex mishmash of electronic signals directly into his body and brain for long periods of time. He's not just streaming his screen jollies, he's also infusing his skull and eyes with modulated radiation documented to cause severe damage to both the structure and function of nervous system tissues. Hold an audio microwave meter to the skull of a kid downloading 4G data into his brain.

You won't believe what you hear in the way of microwave signal intensity.You will be listening to the sound of perfidious and monumental child abuse. What is most shocking about the Microwave Age is not that profit-mongers will gleefully deploy deadly radiation to maim and kill kids for a "buck," but that most Americans submit to such abuse in a livestock sort of way. Unaware, disinterested and possibly too dim to survive as a genetically viable species, Americans just "suck it up." Despite thousands of medical studies warning of dire medical ramifications, the masses remain willfully clueless about what the US military knew seventy-five years ago: that each human tissue and internal organ has its own dielectric properties and that the brain, heart and lungs are primary hot spots for the wave carcinogen ever-flowing through weak and ailing bodies. [28] In 2015, the lucky people of France were blessed with national legislation that provides these protections in regards to RF/microwave antenna pollution:

  1. Cell tower compliance with public exposure standards are routinely verified by officials of the National Radiofrequency Agency.

  2. Up-to-date environmental/cell tower maps plus radiation measurements near homes are made available to the public and every resident is able to access information on radiation levels in his own living spaces.

  3. Areas with atypical microwave exposure are subject to consistent compliance inspection and enforcement.

  4. The French national government continues evaluation of health effects from microwave antennas and follows up with scientific research to study public health effects.

  5. All Wireless Fi hotspots are clearly marked with a warning pictogram. [29] France and many other countries are moving towards this sanity because the number of media reports about human cancer clusters near cell towers is staggering.

A 2010 report in the Telegraph newspaper of Britain is typical: "Half of the residents of Buckler, Cornwall, have complained of ill health since the structure [mobile phone antenna tower] was installed two years ago. They believe that the 02 mobile phone mast has contributed to the death of eight residents from cancer since it was erected... 'We are living in a cancer cluster,' said Mr. Lewis. 'More than fifty per cent of the residents here said they have had serious health problems since the mast was put up. Then people suddenly started dying from cancer and now two more have just been diagnosed and one of those is terminally ill.' " [30] Such reports from around the world have been accumulating for decades, one of them documenting a cancer cluster of over one hundred cases at a public school in Spain with an antenna tower on campus. [31] There are countless archived reports of entire communities reporting ill health after cellular antennas are activated, such as 162 antenna-sickened people in Nobeoka City, Japan. [32]

Yet tragically, America's federal, state and local governments profit so hugely from the Wireless cancerization of the USA, that none see fit to enforce proper environmental radiation measurements and compliance. Crucial cell tower emissions information is kept inaccessible to the public. There is no popular demand for proper tower setbacks from inhabited buildings. There is no momentum for desperately needed investigations of neighborhood antenna sickness. The obvious reward for such savage oblivion is the fact that the women of North America now suffer the highest female cancer rates in the world. [33]


Microwave Radiation Sickness Studies: State of Public Health in the United States

Listed below are published studies, mainly from medical and scientific sources, which document the dramatic health effects of cancer-delivery antennas sited close to public and residential places. These reports describe mainly the bio-effects of the older broadcast, radar and 2G/3G antenna technologies. No one yet has a clear understanding of how the newer 4G/LTE multiple beam technologies and the new 3D beam-forming matrix systems and the upcoming 5G millimeter wave technologies can maim and exterminate. But at least, these preliminary studies provide primitive data about microwave sickness, in all of its ugly manifestations. Be assured that since the mid-1980s, millions of people in every state USA have been suffering the horrific fallout of antenna radiation, as documented below. If anyone cared enough to research your radiation-drenched neighborhood, here is what they would find (and more):

Lester and Moore (1982)
This study of 92 active Air Force bases operational between 1950-1969 found that counties with an active base had significantly higher incidences of cancer mortality compared to counties without. The authors hypothesized that the chronic, low intensity microwave exposure to peak pulse patterns characteristic of radar (microwave radiation) at the bases could damage immunity and account for the high cancer mortality in military counties. [34] Numerous other reports of community sickness from radar installations have come to light in the last thirty years. Recent reports include: an epidemic of sickness and mental retardation suffered by people in Taiwan who live close to Doppler weather radar stations [35] and an ongoing investigation of a childhood cancer cluster near eight military-grade radar towers in Herkimer County, New York State. [36] In addition to police, weather and military radar pollution which blankets the US, the upcoming V2V and driverless car/truck systems are slated to additionally smother the population with new and universal systems of ground-level radar pollution. Ask John Krafcik, CEO of Google's self-driving car division, or Elon Musk of Tesla Motors if they give a hoot!

Kolodynski & Kolodynska (1996)
This study found that school children living near a radio location station in Latvia suffered reduced motor function, memory and attention span. [37]

Magras et al. (1997)
Researchers reported a decrease in reproductive function of mice exposed to cell tower radiation and irreversible sterility was documented in fifth generation offspring. [38]

Hecht & Balzer (1997)
A review of hundreds of Soviet Russian studies documented a vast array of health effects, including insomnia, brainwave aberrations, cardiovascular problems and increased susceptibility to infections in people who lived or worked near RF/microwave antenna transmission sites. [39]

Colorado Department of Health
Audits of Lookout Mountain Broadcast Towers near Golden, Colorado: State audits conducted in 1999 and 2004 found a statistically significant brain tumor incidence in populations living closest to and in direct line-of-sight to TV/FM radio towers on Lookout Mountain. Some affected populations were irradiated with broadcast radiation at levels 100 times or more lower than the FCC's non-ionizing radiation limits. [40]

Santini et al. (2002)
530 people living near mobile phone masts in France reported headaches, sleep disturbance, discomfort, irritability, depression, memory loss and concentration problems. These effects were more pronounced the closer people lived to the mast. The researchers concluded that the minimal distance of people from cell tower antennas should not be less than 300 meters. However, this recommended minimal distance pertains only to the antennas affecting people in this particular study and does not necessarily pertain to other antenna installations, which may be more far-reaching due to power density, or more acutely bio-intensive due to various frequencies emitted. [41]

Santini et al.(2003)
This was the second part of the above Santini study, and it confirmed results of the 2002 study. It additionally showed that people irradiated for five years or more suffered significantly increased irritability, compared to those exposed to a shorter duration. Also, older people were documented to be more sensitive to the radiation. Homes that faced antennas, particularly within 100 meters, were documented to be the worst locations for certain debilitating symptoms. [42]

Navarro EA et al. (2003)
This study, conducted in Spain, found that the greater the power density of microwaves in the home, the more severe were complaints of depression, fatigue, sleeping disorders, concentration problems, headaches, irritability, memory problems, loss of appetite, nausea, audio and visual dysfunction, dizziness and cardiovascular problems. The researchers concluded: "There is a large and coherent body of evidence of biological mechanisms that support the conclusion of a plausible, logical and causal relationship between RF exposure and neurological disease. Hence, it is probable that cell sites are causing many adverse health effects. Public health surveys of people living in the vicinity of cell site should be being carried out now, and continued progressively over the next two decades. This is because prompt effects such as miscarriage, cardiac disruption, sleep disturbance and chronic fatigue could well be early indicators of the adverse health effects." [43] Roosli (2004)
This Swiss survey study reported that out of 429 questionnaires returned, 394 people reported symptoms from cell tower exposure. Fifty eight percent of these symptomatic people suffered headaches, 19% nervous stress, 18% fatigue, while concentration difficulties were the most common complaint. "Two thirds of complainants had taken some action to reduce their symptoms. The most common measure was to avoid exposure if possible." [44]

Eger et al. (2004)
This study, commissioned by the German Federal Agency for Radiation Protection, compiled medical histories between 1994-2004 of people living in Naila, Germany. The study found a threefold increase in malignant tumors for people exposed for five years or more to cell tower antennas within 400 meters, compared to people living further away from the antennas. [45]

Wolf and Wolf (2004)
A Tel Aviv University study of 622 people living in Netanya, Israel, revealed an overall four-fold increase in the incidence of cancer among residents living within 350 meters of a mobile phone mast for a time period of between three and seven years. Among women in the 350-meter group, the increase in cancer was 10 times the norm, compared to people living in other areas of the city: "The study indicates an association between increased incidence of cancer and living in proximity to a cell phone transmitter station." [46]

Bortkiewicz et al. (2004)
This Polish study confirmed that residents living close to mobile phone masts reported "various complaints mostly of the circulatory system, but also of sleep disturbances, irritability, depression, blurred vision, concentration difficulties, nausea, lack of appetite, headache and vertigo. The performed studies showed the relationship between the incidence of individual symptoms, the level of exposure, and the distance between a residential area and a base station. This association was observed in both groups of persons, those who linked their complaints with the presence of the base station and those who did not notice such a relation." [47]

California study (2004)
A pilot medical study, conducted by Dr. Gunnar Heuser of Agoura Hills, California, focused on neurological symptoms of six firefighters who had been working for up to five years in stations with cell towers on premises. Their symptoms included: slowed reaction time, lack of focus, lack of impulse control, severe headaches, anesthesia-like sleep, depression, tremors and toxic encephalopathy, involving brain damage to frontal and temporal lobes, as confirmed by SPECT brain scans. In 2004, citing this study, the US and Canadian membership of the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) passed a resolution opposing the siting of cell tower antennas on or adjacent to fire stations. [48]

Waldman-Salsam et al. (2004)
Medical doctors in Oberfranken, Germany, evaluated the medical complaints of 356 people exposed to cell tower radiation and in-home wireless devices. This irradiated population reported these symptoms: sleep disturbances, tiredness, forgetfulness, nose bleeds, vision and hearing problems, frequent infections, blood pressure abnormalities, hormonal and heart disturbances, nausea and night-time sweats. This information was presented to the German prime minister in a now-famous document known as the Bamberg Appeal, signed by 114 German physicians. [49]

Hutter et al. (2005)
365 people living near 10 different mobile phone masts in both urban and rural areas of Austria were studied. Reported symptoms of antenna radiation included: headache, vertigo, tremors, cold hands and feet, loss of energy, exhaustion, difficulty concentrating, feelings of strain and the urge for sleep. These people were irradiated at levels of 0.2 to 0.4 volts per meter, which is hundreds of times lower than legal US exposure standards of 47 to 61 volts per meter. The higher the voltage exposure, the higher the percentage of health complaints. The researchers concluded: "The results of this study indicate that effects of very low but long lasting exposures to emissions from mobile telephone base stations on well-being and health cannot be ruled out." [50]

Citizens Initiative Kempton West (2006-2007)
Anticipating the installation of a T-Mobile transmitter station in a neighborhood, 25 participating residents living between 15 to 300 meters from the new cell tower volunteered for blood sampling before the antennas were turned on. These volunteers removed all DECT phones and Wi-Fi systems from their homes for the test period. This study was part of a German-wide medical investigation into the effects of cell tower radiation on human health, led by Dr. Hans Scheiner in Munich. The study focused mainly on blood levels of the mood hormone serotonin and the sleep hormone melatonin, both created by the pineal gland. A healthy person creates serotonin by day for alertness and energy, melatonin by night for deep restorative sleep and protection from DNA damage. After the antennas were turned on, follow-up blood tests revealed this:

  1. Fifty-six percent of volunteers suffered a fairly steep reduction of night time melatonin and 28 percent showed a more gradual decline, leading to considerable sleep disturbances, daytime exhaustion and immune deficiencies due to sleep deprivation.

  2. Eighty-four percent of volunteers suffered a steep decrease in day time serotonin levels, resulting in depressive mood disturbances, lethargy, appetite abnormalities, agitation and general reduction of quality of life. Signed by three medical doctors this study concluded: "Since the medically conducted tests carried out on residents living in the vicinity of the....mast prove a dramatically increased health risk, immediate action by political and regulatory authorities...are demanded." [51]

Abdel-Rassoul, et al. (2006)
Residents living beneath or adjacent to a long-established mobile phone mast with numerous antennas in Egypt reported significantly higher occurrences of headaches, memory changes, dizziness, tremors, depressive symptoms and sleep disturbance than did a control group. [52]

Oberfeld et al. (2008)
The Austrian Department of Health uncovered a higher risk of cancer among people living 80-200 meters from a mobile phone antenna tower which operated for a car phone service between 1984 and 1997. The study concluded that the cancer risk increased with the length of exposure, reaching 8.5 times the norm for people most highly exposed. The study reported: "The incidence [of cancer] was particularly pronounced for breast and brain tumors." [53]

Eger et al. (2009)
The Bavarian town of Selbitz conduced a health survey of 251 residents exposed to cell tower radiation at no more than 1 volt per meter. The study found a significant correlation, depending on dose exposure, for: insomnia, depression, cerebral symptoms, joint illnesses, infections, skin changes, heart and circulation disorders, disorders of vision/ hearing and problems of the gastrointestinal tract. [54]

Balmori et al. (2009)
Researchers exposed tadpoles of the common frog to cell tower radiation from several antenna installations 140 meters from the study site. Control tadpoles were protected from the radiation by a shielded Faraday cage. The irradiated tadpoles were exposed for two months and suffered low coordination of movements, asynchronous growth (abnormally large and small tadpoles) plus a 90% mortality rate. The non-irradiated controls developed normally and suffered only a 4.2% mortality rate. The report concluded: "This research may have huge implications for the natural world, which is now exposed to high microwave radiation levels from a multitude of phones masts." [55]

Dode et al. (2011)
University and municipality officials cooperated to document a striking connection between cell tower antennas and cancer deaths in Brazil's third largest city, Belo Horizonte. The study looked at 7191 deaths by cancer in the city between 1996 and 2006. The highest rate of deaths from cancer was found among those who had lived within 500 meters of cell phone antenna towers. The highest rates of cancer were also found in the central-southern area of the city, which had the most cell towers. There were high rates of prostate, breast, lung, kidney and liver cancer among the victims living closest to tower antennas. [56]

Buchner et al. (2011)
In this study conducted in Bavaria, Germany, urine samples of 60 study participants were analyzed for their adrenaline, noradrenaline, dopamine, and phenylethylamine (PEA) levels before and after the activation of a new GSM cell tower. After the activation of the antennas, the stress hormone levels increased significantly during the first six months while dopamine and PEA levels decreased substantially. Even after one and a half years, the initial normal hormone levels were not restored. Sleep problems, headaches, allergies, dizziness, and concentration problems were common. The highest exposure group was only 100 µW/m2, and only 60 µW/m for the lowest exposure group. (These power density readings equate to .1 volts per meter squared to .2 volts per meter squared.) This study indicates that radio frequency transmitters induce radical changes in human stress hormones and set up the classic stress syndrome of adaptation followed by biological exhaustion, as established by Hans Seyle in the 1950s. The researchers stated that the effects of cell tower radiation "showed a dose-response relationship and occurred well below current limits for technical RF radiation exposures. Chronic dysregulation of the catecholamine system has great relevance for health and is well known to damage human health in the long run." [57]

Yakymenko et al. (2011)
A team of Ukrainian scientists titled their overview of cell tower radiation "Long-term Exposure to Microwave Radiation Provokes Cancer Growth: Evidences from Radars and Mobile Communication Systems." These researchers concluded: "It is now becoming increasingly evident that assessment of biological effects of non-ionizing radiation based on physical (thermal) approach used in recommendations of current regulatory bodies...requires urgent reevaluation....We also emphasize that the everyday exposure of both occupational and general public to MW radiation should be regulated based on precautionary principles which imply maximum restriction of excessive exposure." [58]

Christopher Anthony and Daniel Chen (2011)
As part of a science curriculum project, these two fourteen-year-olds conducted a survey study at their school in Johannesburg, South Africa, regarding the health effects of a cell tower on their school campus. They additionally enrolled students at two other schools, also with cell towers on those campuses. Students who participated in the questionnaire study reported 21 different symptoms including: skin rash, muscular pains, heart palpitations, extreme fatigue, stomach problems, swollen lymph nodes, tinnitus, allergic reactions and metallic taste in the mouth. Seventy-nine percent of the students who participated reported some of these symptoms, thirty percent reported more than four symptoms, five percent suffered more than 10 symptoms and one percent suffered from up to 14 symptoms on the list. School officials at the boys' school reportedly initiated proceedings to have the cell tower removed from their particular campus. [59]

Eskander, et al. (2012)
This study followed volunteers who were exposed to microwave radiation from either mobile phones or cell tower antennas over a time period of six years. Blood tests were used for assessment. The study showed a significant decrease in volunteers' ACTH, cortisol, thyroid hormones, prolactin for young females, and testosterone levels. Researchers concluded that "high RFR (radio frequency radiation) significantly affects the pituitary-adrenal axis." [60]

Hassig et al. (2012)
Scientists documented eye abnormalities in calves exposed to cell tower radiation: "We examined and monitored a dairy farm in which a large number of calves were born with nuclear cataracts after a mobile phone base station had been erected in the vicinity of the barn. Calves showed a 3.5 times higher risk for heavy cataract if born there compared to Swiss average. All usual causes such as infection or poisoning common in Switzerland could be excluded." [61]

Cy et al. (2012)
This Taiwanese study focused on childhood neoplasms (tumors) in relation to RF exposure from cell towers erected between 1998 and 2007. Researchers calculated the annual power emitted by all 71,185 cell towers in Taiwan and compared the calculated exposure of populations in each irradiated township: "This study noted a significantly increased risk of all neoplasms [tumors] in children with higher-than-median RF exposure to MPBS [mobile phone base stations]." [62]

Gomez-Peretta et al. (2013)
This study in Spain was a re-analysis of the data collected for the Navarro study (2003). The researchers reported that pathological symptoms reported by irradiated people were validated once again. Exposure levels suffered by study participants were reported at only .2 volts to 0.6 volts per meter [compared to US maximum public exposure limit of 61 volts per meter]. [63]

Shahbazi et al. (2014)
This Iranian study was conducted on 250 randomly-selected people living near cell towers. Statistically significant symptoms included: nausea, headache, dizziness, irritability, discomfort, nervousness, depression, sleep disturbances, memory loss and lack of libido among people living within 300 meters of the cell tower antennas, compared to those living further away. [64]

Ghandi et al. (2014)
This case-control study evaluated genetic damage in individuals living in the vicinity of cell towers. The blood of irradiated subjects showed significantly elevated DNA damage compared to non-irradiated control subjects matched for gender, age and other factors. Especially affected by cell tower DNA damage were females. The researchers warned: "The genetic damage evident in the participants in this study needs to be addressed against future disease-risk, which in addition to neurodegenerative disorders, may lead to cancer." [65]

Shiniyo et al. (2014)
This Japanese study, peer-reviewed by a German medical team, documents the myriad serious health effects suffered by condominium inhabitants living under rooftop antennas in Japan. This study is important because it documents a long list of illnesses suffered by the condo inhabitants during their years of exposure and compares the improved health status of survivors after the antennas were deactivated. The symptoms ascribed to microwave radiation by this study include: numerous and painful neurological dysfunctions, eye damage, severe fatigue and tumors. [66]

Cammaerts Tricot et al. (2015)
Two renowned European scientists conducting this study found that water cress seeds would not germinate in a room infiltrated with cell tower radiation from two antennas about 200 meters outside the windows of the room. Measurements showed that the antennas were propagating 900 megahertz and 1.8 gigahertz directly into the room. The power density of the radiation impacting the seed trays was only .1 volts per meter2. This is a power density hundreds of times lower than that approved for US public exposure to microwave radiation in the gigahertz range. Identical but radiation-protected seed trays in the same room germinated normally: "When removed from the electromagnetic fields, seeds germinated normally. The radiation was, thus, most likely the cause of the non-occurrence of the seeds' imbibitation and germination." [67] Sultan Ayoub Meo et al. (2015)
This study recruited students in Saudi Arabia for blood testing (ages 12 to 17) attending two comparable schools. Students in the school infused with the highest cell tower radiation suffered a higher rate of diabetes than the students less irradiated: "It is concluded that exposure to high RF-EMRF generated by mobile phone base stations is associated with elevated levels of HbA1c and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus." [68]

Waldmann-Selsam (2016)
Using mathematical calculations of microwave power flux density, this field-monitoring study examined the effects of cell tower radiation on trees in two German cities: "Statistical analysis demonstrate that electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone masts is harmful for trees. These results are consistent with the fact that damage afflicted on trees by mobile phone towers usually starts on one side, extending to the whole tree over time." [69]

Golati et al. (2016)
The objective of this study was to evaluate human genetic damage caused by radiation from mobile tower antennas and to ascertain whether that damage might be dependent upon the aberrant GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes. Scientists studied 116 persons exposed to radiation from mobile towers and 106 control subjects. All were genotyped for polymorphisms in the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes by the multiplex polymerase chain reaction method. The researchers looked for DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes using alkaline comet assay and micronucleus assay in buccal (mouth tissues) cells. They found no evidence that the two particular genes were involved in promoting that DNA damage among the subjects. But they did find significant DNA damage among cell tower subjects as compared to the non-irradiated control group: The report states: "...There was a significant increase in BMN [micronucleus assay in buccal cells] frequency and TM [tail moment] value in exposed subjects (3.65 ± 2.44 and 6.63 ± 2.32) compared with control subjects (1.23 ± 0.97 and 0.26 ± 0.27)...” [70] Siersma et al. (2016)
As a pilot run for future and larger studies, medical scientists from Denmark and Sweden launched an electronic questionnaire posted to special interest websites. The questionnaire requested feedback on symptoms suffered by people exposed to cell phones, Wi-Fi, occupational radiation, energy-saving light bulbs and cell towers. Of sixty respondents, significant associations were noted for both chronic exposure to Wi-Fi and for cell tower exposure. Symptoms associated with tower antennas included: cognitive, head, eye, body and skin problems. The report noted: "Mobile phone towers seem to be the most problematic of the various EMF exposures." [71]


Conclusion: Say "No Thanks" To Avoid the Wireless Trainwreck

Since the Microwave Age began three decades ago, the radiation-sick and the radiation-wise have avoided antenna hotspots whenever possible and have wisely sought safer places.

What the Wireless Radiation Industry calls "dead zones" have long been Nirvana to those who prefer to preserve the integrity of natural life and skip the gruesome experiences of Wireless cancer. Now, the industry's foremost goal is to completely eliminate the existence of "dead zones" so that every "connected" thing in the human anthrosphere can be watched, manipulated and controlled by Central Authority. While concerned bio-scientists ride a stage coach to assess damage from the older and tamer ray technologies, the great and powerful Techno-Beast rides an F-16 in its inexhaustible quest for new ways to radiation-rape the planet and deconstruct every living thing upon it.

Well-funded armies of radiation elves, most of them young males (the demographic reportedly best able to withstand chronic electromagnetic abuse), work relentlessly to churn out new experimental devices and propagation systems for the Internet of Things (IoT) and for 5G millimeter wave technologies. These upcoming weapons of mass destruction require millions of tiny, new antennas that will submerge all living creatures in yet another raging tsunami of wave carcinogen. For the USA, already blighted with the highest rates of cancer on this earth, there are only four words out of the wireless train wreck ahead: "Thanks, but no thanks!"

  • No thanks to unsafe, hand-held mobile devices that eviscerate the DNA
  • No thanks to microwave-infused buildings that make people weak and ill
  • No thanks to decadent mobile entertainment for babies and grade schoolers
  • No thanks to the unregulated Wi-Fi assault of fetuses and kindergartners
  • No thanks to microcells hung on office walls and hidden under stadium seats
  • No thanks to "smart" meters and appliances that induce and stimulate tumors
  • No thanks to consumer gadgets and vehicles that beam Wi-Fi/Blutetooth
  • No thanks to cell towers and DAS antennas on doorsteps
  • No thanks to bizarre mass experiments with millimeter wave technologies


A nation unable to say "no thanks" to its own destruction surely has a hard road down. Human history indicates that all deadly mass manias eventually reach their limit, but usually only after millions of people have suffered and died tragically. The question remains: how far will America's Wireless holocaust progress before survivors finally comprehend the appalling price of unsafe Wireless radiation technologies?


  1. Camilla Rees speaking at the New York City Forum: Drunk on Wireless: Public Health Consequences of Cell Phone and Wireless Technologies are Begging for Society's Attention, May 22, 2016.

  2. BioInitiative Report 2012 (2014). This report, based on 1800 published studies, was prepared by 29 authors from ten countries, ten holding medical degrees (MDs), 21 PhDs, and three MsC, MA or MPHs. Among the authors are three former presidents of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, and five full members of BEMS.

  3. Belyaev et. al., EUROPAEM EMF Guidline 2015 for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of EMF-Related Health Problems and Illnesses, Reviews on Environmental Health 2015; 30(4):337-371. EUROPAEM stands for European Academy of Environmental Medicine. EUROPAEM is an international organization of thirteen prestigious European Universities, representing ten nations. These groups have united to advance education, academic conferences and research, with a working group organized to study electrohypersensitivity [EHS].

  4. "Radiofrequency Radiation at Stockholm Central Railway Station in Sweden and Some Medical Aspects on Public Exposure to RF Fields," Hardell et al., International Journal of Oncology, July 27, 2016.

  5. "Increasing Incidence of Thyroid Cancer in the Nordic Countries with the Main Focus on Swedish Data," Carlberg et al., BCM Cancer, July 2016. Thyroid cancer has fairly exploded in Sweden, especially since 2008, when Apple introduced the multiple-antenna iPhone there. Most smart phones feature antennas at the bottom of the phone closest to the thyroid when the phone is held against the head and jaw: "The incidence of thyroid cancer is increasing in many countries, especially the papillary type that is the most radiosensitive type."

  6. Cellular Telephone Russian Roulette, Robert C. Kane, Vantage Press, 2001, p. 96.

  7. This is 2016 information from UK radio engineer Alasdair Philips in a personal letter to colleagues. Philips is the genius inventor of the Acoustimeter, a broadband audio microwave detector used to identify ambient RF signals.

  8. "Are Third Generation Cellphones with Lower Radiated Power More Carcinogenic than Second Generation Cellphones?: An Exploration of Recent Data," Morgan et al., 2016.

  9. "Real Versus Simulated Mobile Phone Exposures in Experimental Studies," Panagopoulos et al., BioMed Research International, Volume 2015, Article ID 607053, 8 pages.

  10. Report of the European Union's REFLEX Project (Risk Evaluation of Potential Environmental Hazards from Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure Using Sensitive in vitro Methods), November 2004. An in-depth report on the REFLEX project can be found in the on-line brochure Health and Electromagnetic Fields: EU-funded research into the Impacts of Electromagnetic Fields and Mobile Phones on Health published by the European Commission, 02-29-2008.

  11. Evidence for Genotoxic Effects, Dr. Henry Lai, Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, page 11. Prepared for the BioInitiative Working Group, July 2007, BioInitiative Report 2007.

  12. This statement by Dr. Sam Milham was made in a 2015 letter to a colleague regarding hazards of cell tower location.

  13. Mobile Phone Masts and Wireless Computing, Alasdair and Jean Philips, PowerWatch, UK, 2009. LINK

  14. BioInitiative Report 2012, op. cit.

  15. "The Use of Signal-Transduction and Metabolic Pathways to Predict Human Disease Targets from Electric and Magnetic Fields Using in Vitro Data in Human Cell Lines," Parham et al., Frontiers in Public Health, Sept. 2016, Volume 4, Article 193.

  16. "Corona Ion Emissions from High Voltage Powerlines and Implications for Human Health," Fews et al., 1999, 2002-2005, H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TL, U.K. "Corona ions emitted from high voltage power lines transfer their charge to aerosol particles, as shown in figure 1, following well known ion-aerosol attachment rates. When inhaled, these aerosols have a higher probability of depositing in the lung owing to their enhanced charge state. Corona ions therefore mediate increased exposure to air pollution. Space-charge comprising ions per se and charged aerosols can be carried by the wind, typically several hundred metres and in some cases several kilometres from powerlines (Fews et al., 1999, 2002). A risk analysis based on an average 30% increase in lung deposition of inhaled air pollution up to 400 metres from power lines downwind of the prevailing south-westerly wind, suggests an increased frequency of illnesses linked to air pollution, including childhood leukaemia, lung cancer, cardiovascular and respiratory illnesses." (Henshaw 2002).

  17. "Verizon Looks to Dark Fiber, Small Cells for Densification, RCR Wireless News, 09-10-2015.

  18. "Verizon First in US with Ericsson Radio Dot System," ericsson.com, 02-27-2015. Ericsson, based in Sweden, is a leading global force for wireless irradiation of the planet. This juggernaut reported net sales of $33 billion in 2014.

  19. "Overloading of Towns and Cities with Radio Transmitters: A Hazard for Human Health and a Disturbance of Eco-Ethics, Karl Hecht et al., International Research Center of Healthy and Ecological Technology (IRCHET), Berlin, 12-10-201l.

  20. Ibid.

  21. "Cumulative Burden of Comorbid Mental Disorders, Substance Use Disorders, Chronic Medical Conditions and Poverty on Health Among Adults in USA," Walker et al., Psychology, Health and Medicine, 08-16-2016. LINK

  22. "Warning: Your Cell Phone May be Hazardous to your Health." Christopher Ketcham, GQ Magazine, 01-25-2010.

  23. Ibid.

  24. Kids Wireless Use Facts, CTIA — The Wireless Association, 2016

  25. Glow Kids: How Screen Addiction is Hijacking Our Kids — And How to Break the Trance, Nicholas Kardaras, Ph.D., St. Martin's Press, 2016.

  26. "Indiana Looking for Firm to Manage its 300 Cell Towers on Park Land," Wireless Estimator, 09-0802015.

  27. Wireless Estimator is an excellent online source for keeping track of Who is Who in the Wireless Industry and also for keeping abreast of innumerable cancer- inducing radiation projects coming down the pike for USA.

  28. Electromagnetic Theory, J. A. Stratton, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941. See also: "Compilation of the Dielectric Properties of Body Tissues at RF and Microwave Frequencies," Dr. Camelia Gabriel, University of London. This study was completed for Brooks Air Force Base and was published in three successive articles in Physics of Medicine and Biology, Vol. 41, No. 11, pp. 2203-2231, 1996.

  29. "France: New National Law Bans Wi-Fi in Nursery School!" Environmental Health Trust, Dr. Devra Davis, February 15, 2015.

  30. "Mobile Mast Blamed for Cancer Cluster," Telegraph.co.uk, 04-09-2010.

  31. "Hundred Cases of Cancer Linked to an Antenna Near a School in Brenes," LaRazon.es, 01-08-2010.

  32. "'Abnormal Condition Around the Mobile Base: Council Survey of 162 People at Oka Nobu," Asahi.com, 11-17-2010.

  33. The latest global statistics available are from the Globocan charts 2012, compiled by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (arm of the World Health Organization). See the chart HERE. Notice that North American women of the US and Canada have the highest overall cancer rates in the world.

  34. Lester, et al., "Cancer Mortality Near Air Force Bases," Journal of Bioelectricity, 1 (1) 72-82.

  35. "Residents Say Radar Causes Illnesses," Taipei Times, 10-24-2007: The Taiwan Environmental Protection Union (TEPU) took an appeal to the Taiwan government alleging that a Doppler weather radar in Taiwan County was causing high levels of mental retardation and other illnesses in the area.

  36. WKTV News 02-03-2015: "The Kuyahoora Valley region has seen an unusual number of children with cancer in the area in the past 30 years. Now the group, "Kuyahoora Valley - What's Making Us Sick" is petitioning state and federal lawmakers to investigate the site of the Newport Antenna Radiation Pattern Measurement Facility." See also: Kuyahoora Valley: Push for Answers on Radar," Towards Better Health, 03-05-2015.

  37. "Motor and Psychological Functions of School Children Living in the Area of the Skrunda Radio Location Station," Latvia, A.A. Kolodynski et al., Institute of Biology, Latrian Academy of Sciences, 3 Miera Str., Salaspils, LV-2121, Latvia.

  38. "RF Radiation-induced Changes in the Prenatal Development of Mice," Magras et al., Bioelectromagnetics 18:455-461, 1997.

  39. "Biological Effects on Humans of Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range 0 to 3 GHz: Results of a Study of Russian Medical Literature from 1960 to 1996," Hans-Ullrich Balzer, M.D., Karl Hecht, M.D., Institute of Stress Research, Berlin, Germany. LINK

  40. "Radiofrequency Nonionizing Radiation in a Community Exposed to Radio and Television Broadcasting," Burch, JB, Clark et al., Environ Health Perspect, Feb, 2006; 114(2):248-53. See also: "Human Responses to Residential RF Exposure," Reif, John S., Burch, et al., Env. Health Persp. 8.23.05. See also: "The Trouble with Towers," Mile High News, 03-24-2008. Decades of sickness among the people living near broadcast towers on Golden Colorado's Lookout Mountain is outlined in this article.

  41. "Study of the Health of People Living in the Vicinity of Mobile Phone Base Stations," Santini et al., Pathologie Biologie, (Paris) 2002;50:369-73. LINK

  42. "Symptoms Experienced by People in Vicinity of Base Stations II," Santini et al., Pathologie Biologie,(Paris) 2003 September; 51(7):412-5.

  43. "The Microwave Syndrome: A Preliminary Study in Spain," Dr. Gerd Oberfeld, Public Health Department Salzburg, PO Box 527, 2010, Salzburg, Austria. LINK

  44. "Symptoms of Ill Health Ascribed to Electromagnetic Field Exposure: A Questionnaire Survey." Roosli et al., International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 2004, Feb.; 207 (2): 141-50.

  45. "The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Transmission Mast on the Incidence of Cancer,"Eger et al., Umwelt-Medizin-Gessellschaft 17, 2004. LINK

  46. "Increased Incidence of Cancer Near a Cell Phone Transmitter Station," Wolf et al., International Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol. 1, Number 2, April 2004. LINK

  47. "Subjective Symptoms Reported by People Living in the Vicinity of Cellular Phone Base Stations," Bortkiewicz et al., Med. Pr., 2004, 55 (4) 345-51. ABSTRACT

  48. "International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) Votes to Study Health Effects of Cell Towers on Fire Stations," Press Release, Susan Foster Ambrose, Santa Fe, California, August 24, 2004. LINK

  49. Open letter to Prime Minister of Germany, August 2004, Dr. Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam, Bamberg, Germany: "In Oberfranken, we have just evaluated the medical complaints of 356 people who have had long-term [radiation] exposure in their homes....People suffer from one, several or many of the following symptoms: Sleep disturbances, tiredness, disturbance in concentration, forgetfulness, problem with finding words, depressive mood, ear noises, sudden loss of hearing, hearing loss, giddiness, nose bleeds, visual disturbances, frequent infections, sinusitis, joint and limb pains, nerve and soft tissue pains, feeling of numbness, heart rhythm disturbances, increased blood pressure episodes, hormonal disturbances, night-time sweats, nausea. Even at 10μW/m2 (only 0.06 V/m average) many people are becoming ill.

  50. "Subjective Symptoms, Sleeping Problems, and Cognitive Performance in Subjects Living Near Mobile Phone Base Stations," Hutter et al., Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2006; 63:307-313. LINK

  51. "Mobile Telecommunications In Kempten West Blood Levels Alarmingly Altered," emfrefugee.blogspot, 07-01-2008. LINK

  52. "Neurobehavioral Effects Among Inhabitants Around Mobile Phone Base Stations," Abdel-Rassoul et al., Neurotoxicology, August 1, 2006: "Inhabitants living nearby mobile phone base stations are at risk for developing neuropsychiatric problems and some changes in the performance of neurobehavioral functions, either by facilitation or inhibition. So, revision of standard guidelines for public exposure to RER from mobile phone base station antennas and using of NBTB for regular assessment and early detection of biological effects among inhabitants around the stations are recommended." ABSTRACT

  53. Environmental Epidemiological Study of Cancer Incidence in the Municipalities of Hausmannstatten & Vasoldsberg (Austria), Commissioned by the Provincial Government of Styria, Department 8B, Provincial Public Health Office, Graz (Austria), Dr. Gerd Oberfeld, January 20, 2008.

  54. "Specific Symptoms and Radiation from Mobile Base Stations in Selbitz, Bavaria, Germany: Evidence for a Dose-effect Relationship," Eger et al., 2009. LINK

  55. "Mobile Phone Mast Effects on Common Frog (Rana temporaria) Tadpoles: The City Turned into a Laboratory," Alfonso Balmori, Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, Volume 29, 2010, Issue 1. LINK

  56. "Mortality by Neoplasia and Cellular Telephone Base Stations in the Belo Horizonte Municipality, Minas Gerais State, Brazil," Dode et al., Science of the Total Environment, Volume 409, Issue 19, September 1, 2011, pp. 3649-3665. ABSTRACT

  57. "Changes of Clinically Important Neurotransmitters Under the Influence of Modulated RF Fields — A Long-term Study Under Real Life Conditions," Buchner et al., Umwelt-Medizin-Gesellschaft, 2011 24(1) :44-57. LINK

  58. "Long-term Exposure to Microwave Radiation Provokes Cancer Growth; Evidence from Radars and Mobile Communications Systems," Yakymenko et al., Experimental Oncology, 33(2):62-70, 2011. LINK

  59. "Johannesburg Students Find Kids Vulnerable to Cellphone Tower Radiation," timeslive.co.az, 2011.

  60. "How Does Long-term Exposure to Base Stations and Mobile Phones Affect Human Hormone Profiles?," Esklander et al., Clinical BiochemistryJanuary 2012; 45 (1-2) 157-61. ABSTRACT

  61. "Increased Occurrence of Nuclear Cataract in the Calf After Erection of Mobile Phone Base Station," Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd (German) 154(2): 82-86, 2012. ABSTRACT

  62. "A Population-based Control Study of Radiofrequency Exposure in Relation to Childhood Neoplasm," Cy, et al., Science and the Total Environment, 435-436: 472-478, 2012. ABSTRACT

  63. "Subjective Symptoms Related to Radiation from Mobile Phone Base Stations: A Cross-sectional Study," Gomez-Peretta, et al., BMJ open, 2013;3:e003836.

  64. "Health Effects of Living Near Mobile Phone Base Transceiving Station (BTS) Antennae: A Report from Isfahan, Iran," Shahbazi-Gahrouei, et al., Electromagnetic Biology Medicine, 2014, September; 33(3) 206-10. ABSTRACT

  65. "A Cross-sectional Case Control Study on Genetic Damage in Individuals Residing in the Vicinity of a Mobile Phone Base Station," Ghandi et al., Electromagnetic Biology Medicine, 2014, July 9:1-11.

  66. "Significant Decrease of Clinical Symptoms After Mobile Phone Base Station Removal — An Intervention Study," Shinjyo et al., an original scientific publication subjected to peer review by the Scientific Advisory Board of Umwelt-Medizin-Gesellschaft in Germany. In 2004, this German group had published a study titled: "The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone Transmission Mast on the Incidence of Cancer," Eger et al., which documented a triple risk for malignancies among those living near cell tower antennas (for a period of over five years) in the Southern German city of Naila. Shinjyo, T. & Shinjyo, A. (2014), reviewed by German scientists with: Signifikanter Rückgang klinischer Symptome nach Senderabbau eine Interventionsstudie, Umwelt-Medizin-Gesellschaft, 27(4), S. 294-301. LINK

  67. "Effect of Man-made Electromagentic Fields on Common Brassicacae Lepidium Satyum (cress d'Alinois): Seed Germination: a Preliminary Replication Study," Référence Phyton, 84 (pp. 132-137) Publication Publié, 2015.

  68. "Association of Exposure to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Radiation (RF-EMFR) Generated by Mobile Phone Base Stations with Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA 1c) and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus," Sultan Ayoub Meo, et al., International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2015, 12 (11), 14519-14528. LINK

  69. "Radiofrequency Radiation Injures Trees Around Mobile Phone Base Stations," Waldman-Selsam et al., Science and the Total Environment, 2016 Dec 1;572:554-569. LINK

  70. "Effect of GSTM1 and GSTT1 Polymorphisms on Genetic Damage in Human Populations Exposed to Radiation from Mobile Towers," Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, April 2016, Volume 70, Issue 3, pp. 615-625. ABSTRACT

  71. "Vicinity to Wireless Radiation Sources and the Prevalence of Various Health Problems: A Pilot Survey," Siersma et al., 2016. This information was collected by four medical specialists representing the Department of Public Health in Copenhagen and the Department of Neurosciences of the Karolinksa Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, for presentation to the 2016 Europe Conference of the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies and Academic Association of General Practitioners (WONCA) held in June, 2016.


END OF GUEST ARTICLE


Recent News: . . . On March 17, 2016, we presented to Petaluma parents . . . On July 15, 2015 we opposed CA AB-57 . . . RF/EMF on the TWIT Network — Read more

Did You Know . . .

Students in Petaluma City Schools are being exposed to total cumulative Radio Frequency ElectroMagnetic Fields (RF/EMF) microwave radiation at levels 8x higher than our federal maximum public exposure guideline every day.

Despite being made aware, in Spring 2013, of the scientific evidence for health effects caused by RF/EMF microwave radiation exposure, the Petaluma City School District (PCSD) School Board, Superintendent and Principals have done nothing to correct this unsafe condition. Instead, they continue to make matters worse.

This web site was created by a parent of a student in the district who cares about the health and safety of all of our students and teachers. If the health and safety of our students and teachers is more important than the District's convenience, then we will have to change the District's current technology plans and practices — to protect our students and teachers.

Warning!

Exceedingly high levels of RF/EMF microwave radiation in school classrooms produce hazardous environments for students and teachers, alike, impeding learning and undermining health generally. The easy solution? Send internet traffic through wires instead of through the air and our children's brains and bodies.

What Should We Do?

To protect your children, wire them and then turn off all sources of RF/EMF microwave radiation in the classroom. You can take these effective actions to protect the long-term health of your families and our public school employees:

  1. Immediately turn off wireless access points in classrooms where students are not using them.
  2. Eliminate the sources of RF/EMF on PCSD campuses — as many as we can.
  3. Download, print and fill out this non-consent form and submit it to your School Principal and to Superintendent Steve Bolman.
  4. Ask your Principal to fulfill his/her legal duty to provide a safe learning environmentan environment that is verifiably safe, not one that your Principal is guessing might be safe.
  5. Tell the Board of Education you want them to fix this problem now. You can make public comments at 2014 School Board Meetings.

The Petaluma City Schools Board members have ignored mountains of scientific information, sat on their hands and allowed the total cumulative RF/EMF microwave radiation exposure to exceed our federal guidelines many times: total cumulative RF/EMF microwave radiation exposure that is over 1,000 times higher than the FCC's adult maximum public exposure guideline, so far, in the 2013-2014 school year.

Learn More About the Dangers of Wireless Signals

In all things wireless, you want to play it safe with your kids: you want as little as possible, which makes the use of always-on wi-fi and wireless devices in classrooms inappropriate and downright dangerous. Microwave radiation pulsing to and from wireless devices cause DNA breaks, causes the blood-brain barrier to leak toxins from the bloodstream into the brain and causes cells to release highly reactive free radicals into the body's interstitial fluid — which are pre-cursors for tumors.

Compared to an adult brain, a five-year-old’s brain, is encased in a thinner skull and contains more fluid, which makes the child's brain a very effective antenna for RF/EMF. According to studies carried out by industry modelers in Switzerland and France, the bone marrow of a child’s head absorbs 10 times more radiation than that of an adult, while that of infants and toddlers will absorb even more. The radiation from wi-fi and cell phones is virtually identical and equally dangerous. You can read more about this here, here and here. A comprehensive set of links is here.


Board Member Comments Before They Voted 3-0 to Approve the PCSD 2013-2018 Technology Plan:

Michael Baddeley, 6/11/13 Board Meeting Video @ 2:24:15: "We understand we have a safety component we have to address. Jane says [the plan] is kind of a work in progress. I am willing to get started, as long as it is continually revisited as new information comes up, as we learn . . . we may choose to do some hard-wiring, but we need to manage [our wireless], airplane mode or whatever. We don't want to expose anyone unnecessarily. So why not? We need to stay on top of that."
Sheri Chlebowski, 6/11/13 Board Meeting Video @ 2:25:25: "I don't want to personally approve this [plan] and move forward and never revisit any of this. I am definitely going to be held accountable with this information now, and so we are going to need further education on why we are doing it or not doing it so I just need to put it out there that this can't be the last time that we are going to be revisiting these issues.

There are some things that he mentioned that I am particularly interested in, particularly the safety, the second part of safety versus how you use the internet and some of the issues he has put forth. Maybe we can talk about that together some more."

The Evidence Petaluma City School District Record

Dates       Key Events/Activities in 2013
Feb 21 Mtg. w/Mr. Rose & Mr. Cole re: evidence of RF/EMF health effects
Mar 5 Email from Mr. Rose: despite evidence, PCSD will expand wi-fi
Mar 6 Mtg. w/Ms. Kleinholz re: school tour
Mar 25 Mtg. w/Ms. Kleinholz re: scientific evidence of RF/EMF health effects
Apr 15 Mtg. w/Mr. Bolman re: scientific evidence of RF/EMF health effects
Apr 22 Email from Mr. Bolman: despite evidence, PCSD will expand wi-fi
May 14 Presentation to Valley Vista School Council re: dangers of wi-fi
May 14 PCSD Brd. Mtg. public comment re: dangers of wi-fi
May 28 PCSD Brd. Mtg. public comment re: other countries removing wi-fi
June 11 PCSD Brd. Mtg.: spoke about dangers and high cost of tech plan
Dangerous 2013-2018 Technology Plan approved 3-0 by School Board.
June 21 Mtg. w/Ms. Kleinholz re: non-consent to expose children to RF/EMF
June 25 PCSD Brd. Mtg. public comment re: opposing bylaw change
June 26 PCSD refuses to measure RF/EMF in MCCV kindergarten room
June 26 Mr. Bolman sends letter telling us to find another school/district
July 16 MCCV Principal Carvey refuses to turn off WAP in kindergarten room
Aug 6 PCSD communicates it installed 10 WAPS on Valley Vista campus
Aug 7-19 Mr. Bolman/Ms. Kleinholz illegally block access to public records
Aug 20 Mr. Bolman releases report of RESIG magnetic field metering
Aug 21 Filed non-consent for exposing children to RF/EMF at Valley Vista
Aug 22 Mtg. w/Ms. Kleinholz: metered 17,500 µW/m² in VV kindergarten room
Sept 10 PCSD Brd. Mtg. public comment re: metering & FCC/OSHA analysis
Nov 6 Presentation at Mary Collins at Cherry Valley School
Nov 12 PCSD Brd. Mtg. public comment re: negligence of board members
Nov 22 Mtg. w/Ms. Kleinholz re: reasons for not turning off WAP in kindergarten.
She provided no reasons and refused to discuss the matter.
Dec 11 Launch of rfemf.com web site

What Has The School Board Done Since 6/11/13?

The School Board members are accountable, yet there is no evidence they have made any progress on addressing the important RF/EMF health and safety issues. What are they waiting for?


Copyright © rfemf.com 2013-2017. All rights reserved.